BeatrisaDay901

From CCCWiki
Revision as of 07:15, 8 April 2013 by 173.237.182.86 (talk) (Created page with "In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry testified prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and shown American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the c...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry testified prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and shown American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the country of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed communities in a manner similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and pain component, but I do know that every time I shot to popularity on a goal in Vietnam I m...

I'm a war felony. Yes, you heard correctlya war offender! I'd like to explain why.

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and represented American soldiers as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the country of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed towns in a manner reminiscent of Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and pain part, but I do know that each time I took off on a vision in Vietnam I made a holy promise that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army soldier I caught targeting or wanting to ambush our troops on the floor would experience a lot of pain and probably drop his life. Is that any different than razing a town where insurgents put throughout the day and launched attacks at night? I dont think therefore. When I notice it, if the Americans who fought so valiantly on the ground throughout the Vietnam War are war thieves, then so am I.

Without issue, John Kerrys depiction of American troops terrorists, and the opponent as patients of a savage U.S. military which tortures and killings defenseless civilians was extremely popular with the likes of Jane Fonda and other people of the anti-war movement, and at the same time, introduced an extended and effective political career which culminated with his unsuccessful bet for the presidency.

But 1971 was quite a while ago. Could it be vital that we examine this dilemma now? For a special band of American heros it's more important than ever, since they need to set the history straight. I'm discussing people who were captured and kept as prisoners of war. In 1971, many of our POWs were surviving in problems of unbelievable depravation in camps with euphemistic names such As The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It had been a life of agony, where pain and beatings were everyday ticket and many died of starvation and disease.

Most POWs never anticipated to be freedespecially since their captors told them that they could eventually be tried and completed because of their war crimes. Imagine their despair when among their own told the entire world that they were war criminals. The North Vietnamese government couldn't have asked for a better advertising adviser than John Kerry!

I thought I'd never say this, but here goesthank God we are now living in a litigious culture! A group of POWs, experts, and other like-minded people have produced a company called Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).

The building blocks recently submitted a lawsuit with respect to Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, against Kenneth T. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two contacts and helps of Kerrys throughout the 2004 presidential strategy, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and original anti-war activists. The foundation of the suit is also difficult to explain here, however, you may study everything on the VVLF website, which will be In a nutshell, Mister Sherwood produced a documentary named Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The video was never seen because Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only community heroic enough to air the documentarywas power to withdraw after Kerry contacts threatened them with libel suits and even lack of their broadcasting license. If regulations suit profits as in the offing, facts of this effort, plus Kerrys action in 1971 is going to be discussed in available court and turn into a subject of public report. And when that takes place, plenty of liberals and antiwar activists will be really sad.

I am not an activist, significantly less a philanthropist. As a matter of fact, I'm virtually a political separate. But fair is fair, and when I discovered that the VVLF is fighting to finance this extremely important and old lawsuit I reached for my billfold and put my profit the container. You may do as you like, but I do believe that as a, every American is going to the VVLF internet site and pay attention to their side of the history. Their the right thing to do. Once more, their web site is In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry testified prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and represented American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed villages in a fashion similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and torture part, but I do know that each time I took off on a mission in Vietnam I m...

I am a war prison. Yes, you heard correctlya war criminal! Let me describe why.

In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and portrayed American soldiers as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the country of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed neighborhoods in a trend similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know about the rape and torture aspect, but I do know that every time I shot to popularity on a goal in Vietnam I made a sacred vow that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army gift I caught targeting or trying to ambush our troops on the bottom would definitely suffer plenty of pain and probably drop his life. Is that any diverse from razing a town where insurgents hid during the day and introduced attacks through the night? I dont think therefore. When I view it, if the Americans who fought so valiantly on the ground through the Vietnam War are war thieves, then so am I.

Without question, John Kerrys depiction of American soldiers terrorists, and the opponent as subjects of a crude U.S. military which tortures and killings helpless civilians was quite popular with the likes of Jane Fonda and other people of the anti-war activity, and at the same time, presented an extended and effective political job which culminated with his unsuccessful bid for the presidency.

But 1971 was quite a while before. Can it be vital that we discuss this issue now? For a special group of American heros it's more essential than actually, simply because they need certainly to set the history right. I am referring to those who were taken and held as prisoners of war. In 1971, a number of our POWs were surviving in problems of unbelievable depravation in camps with euphemistic names like The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It was a life of misery, where torture and beatings were daily fare and many died of misery and condition.

Many POWs never likely to be freedespecially since their captors told them they could sooner or later be tried and performed for his or her war crimes. Imagine their despair when certainly one of their particular told the entire world that they were war criminals. The North Vietnamese government couldn't have called for a better publicity adviser than John Kerry!

I thought I would never say this, but here goesthank God we are now living in a litigious community! A small grouping of POWs, experts, and other like-minded residents have formed a company named Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).

The foundation recently filed case with respect to Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, against Kenneth T. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two contacts and helps of Kerrys through the 2004 presidential plan, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and longtime anti-war activists. The foundation of the suit is also difficult to explain here, however you may read everything on the VVLF site, which is In a nutshell, Mister Sherwood produced a documentary entitled Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The film was never seen because Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only system heroic enough to air the documentarywas power to withdraw after Kerry contacts confronted them with libel matches and even lack of their broadcasting license. If the law suit profits as in the offing, facts of this effort, plus Kerrys exercise in 1971 is going to be discussed in open court and develop into a issue of public history. And when that takes place, a lot of liberals and antiwar activists will be really unhappy.

I'm no activist, much less a philanthropist. As an issue of fact, I'm just about a political independent. But fair is fair, and when I realized that the VVLF is struggling to finance this vitally important and old lawsuit I achieved for my billfold and put my money in the container. You can perform as you like, but I believe that as a, every American is going to the VVLF website and pay attention to their side of the history. Their the right move to make. Yet again, their website is